Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | rogedeckwins | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | troygg36 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | crismtg77 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | mcbronze | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | genyao | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , Bant Beanstalk , Domain Overlords , Domain Ramp , Domain Zur Overlords , Esper Pixie , Esper Zur , Niv Supreme , Selesnya Beanstalk , Unclassified
Meta Performance Analysis
Zur, Eternal Schemer ranks #228 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 67%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Multi average: 49.1%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Zur, Eternal Schemer is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 7.82 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.2%. Zur, Eternal Schemer has a win rate of 67.0%, making it 3.1% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lyra Dawnbringer | Legendary Creature — Angel | 9 | 100.0% | 9 |
| Glass Casket | Artifact | 8 | 100.0% | 8 |
| Boon-Bringer Valkyrie | Creature — Angel Warrior | 11 | 86.4% | 9 |
| Riptide Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 7 | 81.0% | 6 |
| Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 26 | 68.2% | 11 |
| Seized from Slumber | Instant | 94 | 62.9% | 42 |
| Exorcise | Sorcery | 26 | 57.6% | 12 |
| Pest Control | Sorcery | 361 | 55.5% | 84 |
| Joust Through | Instant | 7 | 55.4% | 2 |
| Ancient Cornucopia | Artifact | 13 | 55.4% | 3 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Zur, Eternal Schemer than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 1 | 31 | 68.9% | 66.6% | +2.3% |
| Sunfall | Sorcery | 5 | 25 | 70.6% | 68.4% | +2.2% |
| Nissa, Ascended Animist | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 7 | 27 | 70.4% | 68.3% | +2.0% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 36 | 68.8% | 67.8% | +1.0% |
| Atraxa, Grand Unifier | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Angel | 7 | 17 | 70.3% | 69.5% | +0.8% |
| Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 7 | 40 | 67.0% | 66.2% | +0.8% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 30 | 68.0% | 67.5% | +0.5% |
| Overlord of the Hauntwoods | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 39 | 67.5% | 67.1% | +0.5% |
| Doppelgang | Sorcery | 2 | 7 | 67.6% | 67.3% | +0.3% |
| Leyline Binding | Enchantment | 6 | 39 | 67.5% | 67.3% | +0.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 1303 | 100.0% | 48.5% |
| Domain Ramp | 13 | 76.5% | 44.2% |
| Unknown Archetype | 8 | 2.5% | 39.3% |
| Selesnya Beanstalk | 4 | 6.2% | 10.0% |
| 4 Color Beanstalk | 3 | 15.0% | 74.1% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.